Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:03:52 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfsd patch. What next? Message-ID: <20060531140351.GA63824@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060531132421.GC772@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> References: <20060531132421.GC772@dimma.mow.oilspace.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:24:22PM +0400, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: > Hi, list. >=20 > Some time ago Kostik Belousov publish in this list patch for nfsd (see > thread "Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?") for resolving > problem with CPU usage. Several peoples test it (me too) and answer, > what patch is work, but it not committed to CVS. Why? The responsible committer is busy with his paying job. Kris --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEfaJGWry0BWjoQKURAmLCAKDp7bPTuQSjeo6EBdY0YtXL4XqceQCfc/P5 3/wUBwTrvzQKq1yXiu+tUHQ= =gBqS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060531140351.GA63824>