Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:19:25 +0200 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 99144 for review Message-ID: <20060615081925.GB34336@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <200606131344.08736.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200606131712.k5DHCIjF063625@repoman.freebsd.org> <200606131344.08736.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:44:08PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 13 June 2006 13:12, Roman Divacky wrote: > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=99144 > > > > Change 99144 by rdivacky@rdivacky_witten on 2006/06/13 17:12:02 > > > > Make the LINUXBASE path settable via sysctl. Useful when you have more then > one linux bases > > installed etc. > > Since you only check the one global variable, why did you make the sysctl's > try to handle per-prison paths? well... none of the per-prison variables is checkd against anywhere so I thought there's some magic behind and just copied the code from the other variables. can you explain me how this works? to me it seems either like unfinished work or nonsense :) thnx roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060615081925.GB34336>