Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 01:29:02 +0200 From: "Attilio Rao" <attilio@freebsd.org> To: "Steve Kargl" <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ? Message-ID: <3bbf2fe10607011629y4ef82123y744a681a1d03b722@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060701225927.GA10964@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <000f01c69ca5$02fa8ff0$6400a8c0@s2003> <20060701032139.GB4915@dan.emsphone.com> <m3veqhzdev.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <319cceca0607011050j46e184d9w427d8ef8a8ac7373@mail.gmail.com> <20060701223755.GA10881@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060701224324.GA17057@britannica.bec.de> <20060701225927.GA10964@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2006/7/2, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>: > > It depends. If nwcc has no knowledge of floating point > registers, then the optimized npx bzero and copyin/copyout > operations aren't available. Nothing like a slow kernel. Thanks for the trust... http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/#p-memcpy Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe10607011629y4ef82123y744a681a1d03b722>