Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:16:27 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: Heino Tiedemann <rotkap@gmx.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What the hell is going on with mplayer? Message-ID: <20060713151627.GA64464@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <20060713163515.j8xgi8e8kkoswww8@netchild.homeip.net> References: <r2uho3-f5i1.ln1@news.t-online.com> <20060713163515.j8xgi8e8kkoswww8@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Heino Tiedemann <rotkaps_spam_trap@gmx.de> (from Thu, 13 Jul =20 > 2006 15:23:07 +0200): >=20 > >I just wanted to so a simple ??portupgrade mplayer-gtk??, and see what > >habens: > > > > > >** Detected a package name change: mplayer-gtk (multimedia/mplayer) =20 > >-> 'mplayer-gtk2-esound' (multimedia/mplayer) > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > What a surprise, name change. Not mentioned in UPDAT= ING >=20 > Does it needs to be mentioned? portupgrade is able to handle it =20 > without *special* instructions in UPDATING. This port should not set its name based on configured (or in this case automagicaly detected and thus ever changing) features unless it does so as part of a slave port. This has been a minor annoyance for ages. The port should be named mplayer, always. -- Brooks --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEtmPKXY6L6fI4GtQRAog9AJ9J9NP3i19Wj6nhy/Ivw94bzCj8sACgwIT7 h+O0XI40pFTvhIiTMHRGbog= =AFpL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060713151627.GA64464>