Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:13:48 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Interrupts question] Message-ID: <44BCDE8C.9000003@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <200607171326.17133.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <44BB9D21.3010400@dial.pipex.com> <200607171128.00303.jhb@freebsd.org> <44BBBDA6.4010209@dial.pipex.com> <200607171326.17133.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: >>>Interrupt storm detected on "irq18: uhci2"; throttling interrupt source >>> >>> >>which ties to the disk interrupt. Will that be slowing things down? >>Would increasing the storm threshold help (especially disk >>performance)? Guess I'm looking for any mitigation that might be possible. >> >> >> > >There's no easy answer on this. You'll have to run your own benchmarks. If >you don't need USB, then you may just want to leave it out of your kernel >which might help some. > > > OK, thanks for the info and suggestions. Regrettably, leaving out USB isn't an option for us. I'll schedule some benchmarking for all that ample free time I have :-) Best, --Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44BCDE8C.9000003>