Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:01:17 +0200
From:      Andrzej Tobola <ato@iem.pw.edu.pl>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: VIA padlock performance
Message-ID:  <20060719130117.GA66208@amper.iem.pw.edu.pl>
In-Reply-To: <200607191206.k6JC6Iaj045919@lurza.secnetix.de>
References:  <20060718110442.S20487@fw.reifenberger.com> <200607191206.k6JC6Iaj045919@lurza.secnetix.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Oliver,

On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 02:06:18PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> On my EPIA 10000 (1GHz VIA Nehemia) I did some performance
> testing a few months ago under RELENG_6 (not sophisticated
> enough to call it benchmarking).  For testing I used scp(1)
> of a large file (an ISO9660 image, 213 MBytes), because
> that's what I often need to do, so it's an important thing
> for me.  These are the results (averages of several runs):

How exactly you enable it ?

I have on -current:
# kldload padlock
DLOCK: No ACE support.
module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (padlock, 0xc3dd790c, 0) error 22

However:
% kldstat 
Id Refs Address    Size     Name
...............
20    1 0xc3dd6000 3000     padlock.ko
21    1 0xc3dd9000 19000    crypto.ko
22    1 0xc3f2d000 9000     zlib.ko

via5% uname -a
FreeBSD via5 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Jul 16 19:27:03 CEST 2006     ato@vol2:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/DISKLESS  i386

cheers,
-a



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060719130117.GA66208>