Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:42:22 +0800
From:      Kevin Lo <kevlo@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Olivier Houchard <cognet@ci0.org>
Cc:        Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 102267 for review
Message-ID:  <1153806142.4992.10.camel@monet>
In-Reply-To: <20060724163624.GA83205@ci0.org>
References:  <200607240927.k6O9R8ip054278@repoman.freebsd.org> <44C4F543.3090208@errno.com>  <20060724163624.GA83205@ci0.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Olivier Houchard wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:28:51AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> > Kevin Lo wrote:
> > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=102267
> > > 
> > > Change 102267 by kevlo@kevlo_monet on 2006/07/24 09:26:16
> > > 
> > > 	My bad, back this up. I should commit this into my tree, not into p4.
> > 
> > Why is it a mistake?  We need to start using a common tree.  I ended up
> > creating a sam_avila branch that's derived from arm-devel so I can
> > trivially pickup mods that are committed to arm-devel.  I'd like to see
> > everyone working on arm code share arm-devel and push their changes
> > upstream to there until we can work in CVS.
> > 
> 
> I agree. Everyone working in his own P4 branch can be a PITA. arm-devel is
> "experimental" enough that we don't have to worry about breaking things. 

Got it. I'll commit the modified gnu-arm.diff into P4.

> Olivier

	Kevin




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1153806142.4992.10.camel>