Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:44:21 +0900
From:      Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com>
To:        Ian FREISLICH <if@hetzner.co.za>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: em promiscuous mode bug?
Message-ID:  <20060731054421.GB35573@cdnetworks.co.kr>
In-Reply-To: <E1G7Q8J-0003t9-LC@hetzner.co.za>
References:  <20060726022235.GB14991@cdnetworks.co.kr> <E1G7Q8J-0003t9-LC@hetzner.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:16:03AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
 > Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
 > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:07:04AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
 > >  > Hi
 > >  > 
 > >  > It seems that placing an em(4) interface into promiscuous mode the
 > >  > card stops doing hardware offload of 802.1Q tagging, in fact, it
 > >  > stops tagging entirely if vlanhwtag is enabled on the card.
 > >  > 
 > >  > With vlanhwtag:
 > >  > 15:40:48.050645 00:00:5e:00:01:02 > 01:00:5e:00:00:12, ethertype IPv4 (0x0
 > 800), length 70: (tos 0x10, ttl 255, id 44821, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: VRR
 > P (112), length: 56) 196.30.82.61 > 224.0.0.18: VRRPv2, Advertisement, vrid 2, 
 > prio 10, authtype none, intvl 1s, length 36, addrs(7): 157.248.206.115,76.246.4
 > 2.167,148.235.231.80,70.180.123.113,201.169.28.232,19.31.18.203,59.148.50.175
 > >  > 
 > >  > Without vlanhwtag:
 > >  > 15:40:57.419522 00:00:5e:00:01:02 > 01:00:5e:00:00:12, ethertype 802.1Q (0
 > x8100), length 74: vlan 1001, p 0, ethertype IPv4, (tos 0x10, ttl 255, id 44867
 > , offset 0, flags [DF], proto: VRRP (112), length: 56) 196.30.82.61 > 224.0.0.1
 > 8: VRRPv2, Advertisement, vrid 2, prio 10, authtype none, intvl 1s, length 36, 
 > addrs(7): 157.248.206.115,76.246.42.176,8.148.142.115,171.178.137.11,211.216.40
 > .239,67.124.122.122,253.155.32.152
 > >  > 
 > >  > The interface is placed in promiscuous mode by the carp driver.
 > >  > 
 > >  > em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
 > >  >         options=cb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,POLLING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
 > >  >         ether 00:04:23:cf:50:00
 > >  >         media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
 > >  >         status: active
 > >  > 
 > >  > vlan1001: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1
 > 500
 > >  >         inet 196.30.82.62 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 196.30.82.63
 > >  >         ether 00:04:23:cf:50:00
 > >  >         media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
 > >  >         status: active
 > >  >         vlan: 1001 parent interface: em0
 > >  > 
 > >  > carp1001: flags=49<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 1500
 > >  >         inet 196.30.82.60 netmask 0xfffffff0 
 > >  >         carp: BACKUP vhid 2 advbase 1 advskew 0
 > >  > 
 > > 
 > > Hardware VLAN tagging was disabled in em(4) when it operates
 > > in promiscuous mode and em(4) will insert a VLAN tag in the
 > > driver.
 > 
 > Um, no.  When an em interface with hardware VLAN tagging enabled
 > is placed in promiscuous mode, it just _stops_ tagging.  Entirely.
 > The 802.1Q vlan just breaks.
 > 

Would you try latest em(4) in CURRENT?(if_em.c, rev. 1.122)

 > Ian
 > 
 > --
 > Ian Freislich

-- 
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060731054421.GB35573>