Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:43:24 +0200 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: re interface broken Message-ID: <20060803164324.25001883.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> In-Reply-To: <20060803135811.b79cf899.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> References: <20060802161634.eff2b6d1.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20060803002615.GA49195@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20060803105850.5254d278.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20060803104610.GC49195@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20060803135811.b79cf899.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:58:11 +0200 Gerrit K=FChn <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> wrote about Re: re interface broken: GK> PY> Would you let me know a if_re.c revison number used to work on your GK> PY> system? GK> I have a working 6.1-stable kernel compiled on 12th of June, so I guess GK> if_re.c from that date or earlier should work. Looking into webcvs, I GK> think that 1.67 worked and 1.68 doesn't. However, to make sure I'd GK> have to check out the old version and recompile. I just did some checkouts and recompiles. if_re.c v1.46.2.14 2006/03/17 does work, if_re.c v1.46.2.15 2006/06/26 doesn't work. cu Gerrit
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060803164324.25001883.gerrit>