Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:14:37 +0200 From: Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@oltrelinux.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>, Paolo Pisati <piso@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 103173 for review Message-ID: <20060804161437.GC1205@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <200608041143.26838.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200608041457.k74EvpSw097626@repoman.freebsd.org> <200608041143.26838.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:43:26AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > In that case you can't call it while holding the BFE_LOCK. > You probably only > need the BFE_LOCK around bfe_stop(). Right, else it will deadlock, thanks. -- Paolo Piso's first law: nothing works as expected!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060804161437.GC1205>