Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:43:37 -0700 From: mark <mark@immermail.com> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>, Christian Brueffer <brueffer@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: netgraph with 10Gig interfaces Message-ID: <44E09A29.2010909@immermail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060814152726.GE96644@cell.sick.ru> References: <44D11785.1080107@immermail.com> <20060811111541.GE96644@FreeBSD.org> <44DC9A51.3030303@immermail.com> <20060814105120.GT96644@FreeBSD.org> <20060814124528.GC1763@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <20060814124810.GB96644@cell.sick.ru> <20060814130452.GD1763@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> <44E094B9.1090303@immermail.com> <20060814152726.GE96644@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:20:25AM -0700, mark wrote: > m> It sounds like there's an assumption it's a driver problem. Note > m> that the intel 10Gig driver (from Interl's website) also does not work > m> with netgraph (works fine otherwise though) > m> > m> Is there something that drivers need to do to support netgraph? > > All Ethernet interfaces should instantly be supported by ng_ether(4). > ATM, I have no idea why you have problems with Neterion and Intel > interfaces. That's what I thought. Is there anything I can send along that would be of use, such as ngctl output with debug on? Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44E09A29.2010909>