Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:16:43 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, maho@FreeBSD.org, infofarmer@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Enforcing "DIST_SUBDIR/DISTFILE" uniqueness Message-ID: <44E941BB.7030408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060821.103329.34694587.chat95@mac.com> References: <cb5206420608160931q65adc8fft6084e7f498b403f5@mail.gmail.com> <cb5206420608190944o5c07dbefwfdf50586ae23ef5a@mail.gmail.com> <44E81C12.9050306@FreeBSD.org> <20060821.103329.34694587.chat95@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
NAKATA Maho wrote:
> In Message-ID: <44E81C12.9050306@FreeBSD.org>
> Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
>> I recently added logic to portmaster to handle this kind of situation
>> transparently for the user. A more general solution to this part of the
>> problem could be had by improving the logic in the 'make checksum' target.
>> OTOH, your solution would break the logic that portmaster (and I believe
>> portupgrade also) uses to detect and delete stale distfiles.
>
> It seems that I should not say something about such kind of issue.
Why not? You certainly won't offend me. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44E941BB.7030408>