Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:25:28 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new em-driver still broken Message-ID: <eiaao5$kt0$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <200611010753.55556@aldan> References: <200610282112.k9SLC0cC024602@corbulon.video-collage.com> <20061101015738.090863a2@loki.starkstrom.lan> <2a41acea0610311741w653d5bfdhad49d2f606a7cffe@mail.gmail.com> <200611010753.55556@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Why would the scheduler affect the "sys" component of the load (which > shoots to the sky before the machine drops of the network)? I thought, > it only matters for user-space programs (the order in which they run)... It also schedules internal kernel threads (such as device driver interrupt threads, etc.)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eiaao5$kt0$1>