Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 22:38:49 +0100 From: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@bsd.hu> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install docs oddity Message-ID: <20061106213848.GA38031@baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx> In-Reply-To: <20061103205136.57116b6f.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <454A9A72.4050005@freebsd.org> <20061102214151.273c4ef8.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <454AB4ED.4090109@freebsd.org> <20061103054309.3074eb94.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20061103193441.GB1435@baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx> <454BA92F.80100@freebsd.org> <20061103221408.GA4361@baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx> <454BD646.8060904@freebsd.org> <20061103205136.57116b6f.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:51:36PM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:52:38 -0800 > "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I look forward to hearing your testing results. > > > > Thanks! > > And please test the double definition issue if you can. Thanks! OK, I took a bit long but eventually managed to get back to this: with the patch, the package building seems to be working fine still, I even tried "make package FORMATS=txt pdf" and it did the right thing. Was this the double definition issue that you (Tom) mentioned above? If not, can you tell me what else I should test? -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Budapest Hungary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061106213848.GA38031>