Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:26:38 +0100 From: Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phantom Jails Message-ID: <455E0CEE.9010304@erdgeist.org> In-Reply-To: <20061117062952.H18512@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <455D2A7A.90109@erdgeist.org> <20061117062952.H18512@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > while this works you can also reproduce it if you log out of the jail > wait for the sockets to go away entirely and then stop the jail > because what keeps the jail up is not a socket but is related to devfs > and ?tys. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/89528 So you're implying, that releasing the ucreds, that in this case obviously prevent prisons from disappearing, won't work due to stuff that "is releated to devfs and ttys"? Or was that a kind request to have a look into potential ucred leaks in tty and devfs code, as well? :) What unwanted effects could an early release of ucred structures cause? Maybe it was the wrong list to put that question on, after all, which would be appropriate? Regards erdgeist -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFXgztImmQdUyYEgkRArfGAJ0VzR2klSbK/39KSfIGiumrp9ET4ACdHEW5 Hg1YMGukSTzh44TxRHFkGpE= =60Hb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?455E0CEE.9010304>