Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 05:26:53 +0200 From: gareth <bsd@lordcow.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: portupgrade Message-ID: <20061204032653.GA8203@lordcow.org> In-Reply-To: <20061204030400.GA52211@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20061204022115.GA7142@lordcow.org> <20061204023011.GA51889@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061204023644.GA7226@lordcow.org> <20061204030400.GA52211@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun 2006-12-03 (22:04), Kris Kennaway wrote: > Let's move this to the correct mailing list (note reply-to)... sure, the original question then since we've moved lists: On Mon 2006-12-04 (04:21), gareth wrote: > hi, portupgrade doesn't seem to be doing anything? this's the session: > > # portversion -l "<" > gnupg < > p5-Compress-Zlib < > p5-IO-Socket-SSL < > p5-PathTools < > portupgrade < > rsync < > spamass-milter < > # portupgrade -aF > What does portversion -l '<' -v say about the old and new versions? # portversion -l '<' -v gnupg-1.4.5_1 < needs updating (port has 1.4.5_2) p5-Compress-Zlib-1.42 < needs updating (port has 2.001) p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.01 < needs updating (port has 1.02) p5-PathTools-3.23 < needs updating (port has 3.24) portupgrade-2.1.3.3_1,2 < needs updating (port has 2.2.2,2) rsync-2.6.8_2 < needs updating (port has 2.6.9) spamass-milter-0.3.1_1 < needs updating (port has 0.3.1_3)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061204032653.GA8203>