Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:30:14 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Let's use gcc-4.2, not 4.1 -- OpenMP Message-ID: <45817C16.6060708@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <20061214074929.B47100@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20061213192150.CF83D16A417@hub.freebsd.org> <200612131711.50921 .mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <4580DFAB.3080601@FreeBSD.org> <200612140917.25523@aldan> <elrr0d$8g1$1@sea.gmane.org> <20061214074929.B47100@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 04:35:41PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >> For what it's worth: +1. It's going to be practically required even for >> medium-performance applications as CPU clock rate stagnate and more >> cores are grown. I've recently seen a 16-cpu x86 server in 1U! (granted, >> 8 of those are hyperthreaded "CPUs" ;) ) > > and the other 8 are overheated CPUs ? I see you're familiar with that product line :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45817C16.6060708>