Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:15:33 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "Mark Linimon" <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Subject: Re: Overlong mailing-list maintainer address in ports Message-ID: <cb5206420701131215i531e3c16m44198ee2985454f6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20061224113035.GA25941@soaustin.net> References: <cb5206420612231103v69d1780dlefb3d4c62ca10baa@mail.gmail.com> <21940630@bsam.ru> <cb5206420612231234w1b01c0bbgc61f4e8f7827e455@mail.gmail.com> <20061223211725.GB24163@soaustin.net> <20061224120420.0542dfdb@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20061224113035.GA25941@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/24/06, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 12:04:20PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > If I read this right: in Makefiles we should use emulation@FreeBSD.org > > and in PRs freebsd-emulation, right? > > Checking the existing ports, they are all assigned to freebsd-emulation@. Right. The question is, should we stick to shorter form for maintainership or allow both forms being used on a case-by-case basis.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420701131215i531e3c16m44198ee2985454f6>