Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:05:28 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gnupg: discarding older version Message-ID: <444pr91nbb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <20061231080638.H24378@scorpio.seibercom.net> (Gerard Seibert's message of "Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:11:21 -0500 (EST)") References: <20061231080638.H24378@scorpio.seibercom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net> writes: > Running: > /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= > produces this output: > > gnupg-1.4.6_2 < needs updating (index has 2.0.1) > > > Running: > pkgdb -Fv > produces this output: > > Checking for origin duplicates > Duplicated origin: security/gnupg - gnupg-1.4.6_2 gnupg-2.0.1 > Unregister any of them? [no] > > This is from the /usr/ports/UPDATING file: > > 20061221: > AFFECTS: users of security/gnupg > AUTHOR: kuriyama@FreeBSD.org > > The security/gnupg port was upgraded to 2.0.1 (with security fix) > and good-old gnupg-1.4.6 was repocopied to security/gnupg1. > > Both of security/gnupg (2.x) and security/gnupg1 (1.4.x) are > designed not to conflict with each other. So you can use > security/gnupg1 for gpg(1), and use security/gnupg for gpg2(1) > commands. > > All directly dependents are $PORTREVISION bumped, so portupgrade -R > gnupg will works fine. After portupgrade, you will have both of > gnupg-2.0.1 and gnupg-1.4.6. > > Obviously, I now have both versions installed on my PC. My question is > should I simply answer (YES) and unregister the older version of this > program, or simply leave both versions installed. If I unregister the > older version, will it cause any problems? Not unless you wanted to use it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444pr91nbb.fsf>