Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:03:57 +0100 From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@withagen.nl> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Scott Oertel <freebsd@scottevil.com>, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: running mksnap_ffs Message-ID: <45AE9D4D.1090901@withagen.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070117210212.GA40454@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200701161934.l0GJY1mh057095@ambrisko.com> <45AD3507.402@withagen.nl> <20070116203739.GA343@xor.obsecurity.org> <45AE2922.7040306@withagen.nl> <20070117210212.GA40454@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:48:18PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: >> Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> Or waiting until the snapshot operation finishes. You (still) haven't >>> determined that it's actually hanging as opposed to just waiting for >>> the snapshot operation to finish. >> Just upgraded to 6.2-STABLE, and I must say that things are a LOT better: >> >> - It did return a prompt >> - and ran for about 30 minutes on 1,5T >> - Performance gets a little slugish. >> - Playing MP3 of a samba share missed only one beat. >> >> In all it is usable to take snapshots over night. >> >> So that makes me a happy camper... > > That's good - although I don't remember you mentioning you weren't > running 6.2, or I would have told you to do this immediately to pick > up the various fixes made over the past N months. Actually I was running 6.2-something, where something was probably from around mid September. So I've now caught up with that. Something I did indicate when the discussion started, but then that is already a "long" time ago. --WjW
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45AE9D4D.1090901>