Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:23:51 -0600
From:      "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com>
To:        bv@wjv.com
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
Subject:   Re: 6.2 buildworld fails with NO_SHARED
Message-ID:  <790a9fff0701271723k3e7e57bfncc0addbfd3532f46@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070127235408.GA50433@wjv.com>
References:  <20070126161022.GB29530@wjv.com> <20070126171552.GA24490@dan.emsphone.com> <20070127235408.GA50433@wjv.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/27/07, Bill Vermillion <bv@wjv.com> wrote:
> No real problem there, but that brings up another question.
> If - as documented in make.conf(5) - I put use the variable
> NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT it says "set this is you do not want to link
> /bin and /sbin dynamically".
>
> Would that be the way to build statics in /bin and /sbin
> instead of NO_SHARED.
>
I forgot about that option.  Using NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT would be the proper
way to build /bin and /sbin statically, and still have the rest
compied dynamically.

Scot
-- 
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff0701271723k3e7e57bfncc0addbfd3532f46>