Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:14:05 +0000 From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VMware equivalent? Message-ID: <20070206161405.31e1d7d2@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20070206074418.E93062@ns1.internetinsite.com> References: <45C7C7A7.8080709@chrismaness.com> <ba5e78ea0702051626o243d1728k4e0638f4412ba834@mail.gmail.com> <a9f4a3860702051651k76ced89fic018cc7b2588c0a6@mail.gmail.com> <20070206151547.GB15485@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20070206074418.E93062@ns1.internetinsite.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 07:45:43 -0800 (PST) Chris Maness <chris@chrismaness.com> wrote: > I have been running vmware, and it works very well, but if I can find > a open source version that works well, I would like to move in that > direction. Thanks for the tips guys. If you do try qemu try building it with kqemu support. qemu does full emulation (which is needed for running an OS for a different platform). kqemu allows some of the guest OS instructions to run directly on the CPU, which is much faster. kqemu is not as mature as qemu, and if it doesn't works for you, you will find qemu much slower than vmware
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070206161405.31e1d7d2>