Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:20:21 +0100
From:      Dan Lukes <dan@obluda.cz>
To:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Support for 5.x (Was: Re: What about BIND 9.3.4 in FreeBSD in base system ?)
Message-ID:  <45C8AAC5.3060608@obluda.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20070206152536.GX11375@elvandar.org>
References:  <200702012319.l11NJJ7r065204@drugs.dv.isc.org>	<45C2E612.5080002@FreeBSD.org> <45C3B56E.3060706@rxsec.com>	<45C3DCA5.3070908@FreeBSD.org> <45C46EE5.4060404@obluda.cz>	<200702031801.l13I1w2p096068@fire.jhs.private>	<3aaaa3a0702060521t6586d67ag9352d81b8efe6f21@mail.gmail.com>	<20070206144738.GW11375@elvandar.org>	<200702061508.l16F8BQh063421@fire.jhs.private> <20070206152536.GX11375@elvandar.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Remko Lodder napsal/wrote, On 02/06/07 16:25:
> Well, given my  "track-record" for the bugs, you can see that I and
> some other committers try to wreak-havoc under the old PR's. This isn't
> always simple and trivial to do, getting feedback takes ages from time
> to time (logical because the submitter feels annoyed that it took so
> long to get a reply at all) 

	IMHO, the "annoyed" is not main problem. Submitter may not remeber the 
details after several months. In the fact, request for feedback may 
require almost complete re-analysis. Especially when submitter upgraded 
to new release in the meantime...

					Dan


-- 
Dan Lukes                                   SISAL MFF UK
AKA: dan@obluda.cz, dan@freebsd.cz,dan@kolej.mff.cuni.cz



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45C8AAC5.3060608>