Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:12:47 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Oleg Bulyzhin <oleg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Robin Gruyters <r.gruyters@yirdis.nl>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: bge Ierr rate increase from 5.3R -> 6.1R] Message-ID: <20070208060101.V762@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20070208043101.K687@besplex.bde.org> References: <20070125170532.c9c2374hkwk4oc4k@server.yirdis.net> <20070205232800.GA45487@lath.rinet.ru> <20070207003539.I31484@besplex.bde.org> <20070206221857.GA66675@lath.rinet.ru> <20070207193426.P35180@besplex.bde.org> <20070208043101.K687@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, I wrote:
> 6.2 seems to be missing your fix for the time_uptime time warp -- after
> "route delete #remotehost", the negative expire time is slightly less
$
> than the uptime under 6.2, but it apparently should be slightly less
> than 0 as in ~5.2 and -current. I don't understand the expire times
> -- are they really supposed to go negative?
The negative expire time seems to be actually the negative of the time
since the last down/up, not the negative of the uptime, and this behaviour
is the same in ~5.2, 6.2 and -current. 6.2 doesn't need your fix since
it still uses time_second.
Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070208060101.V762>