Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:51:00 -0600
From:      Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org>
To:        "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: softdep_waitidle: Failed to flush worklist [...]
Message-ID:  <45CFF234.3010704@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070212044405.GB70508@over-yonder.net>
References:  <20070211050825.GA70508@over-yonder.net>	<45CFEF10.5050605@freebsd.org> <20070212044405.GB70508@over-yonder.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/11/07 22:44, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 10:37:36PM -0600 I heard the voice of
> Eric Anderson, and lo! it spake thus:
>> Aren't you putting the filesystem on top of the label here?
>> Shouldn't you do something like:
>>
>> newfs -U /dev/md10a
>>
>> instead?
> 
> Probably.  Or just ignore the labelling step altogether, better, since
> there's not meant to be multiple fsen on it.  But then, it was written
> as a quick PoC for the trouble with remounting, not as an example of
> the best way to create a vnode-backed fs  ;)
> 
> 


True.. Just stuck out like a sore thumb to me.. Actually, it may not be 
harmful, but..


Anyway - does this happen if you do the same thing *without* soft 
updates enabled?


Eric




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45CFF234.3010704>