Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:26:08 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Processes stuck in *unp_m after recent uipc changes
Message-ID:  <200702271526.09457.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070227090505.K56223@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <c21e92e20702270007u277d6a9xfaca7883da9dedd@mail.gmail.com> <20070227084214.Y56223@fledge.watson.org> <20070227090505.K56223@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 04:05, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Jiawei Ye wrote:
> >
> >> With the latest uipc locking changes, I experienced a hard lockup on my 
> >> -current machine. Many processes got stuck in *unp_m state and 
> >> ctrl-alt-delete at the console cannot properly restart the machine and I 
> >> had to hard-reset (no coredump available). Is there anyway to diagnose 
> >> this?
> >
> > Please configure WITNESS, DDB, and BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER on a box with a 
serial 
> > console.  Then attach the output of "ps", "show alllocks", and "alltrace" 
to 
> > an e-mail.  With any luck, this is a leaked lock in some missed error case 
> > and we can just add a missing unlock.  Thanks!
> 
> Obviously, INVARIANTS also good on general principle. :-)
> 
> See the handbook chapter on debugging, and in particular live DDB debugging, 
> if you're running into any problems.

'show allchains' also considered helpful as it will reveal any deadlocks.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702271526.09457.jhb>