Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:54:26 +0200
From:      grem <freebsdusb@bindone.de>
To:        freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: usb/110988: [patch] Handling of quirk IGNORE_RESIDUE is umass.c is broken
Message-ID:  <4626BDC2.7060904@bindone.de>
In-Reply-To: <200704061744.07179.hselasky@c2i.net>
References:  <200703290011.l2T0BAKa035949@www.freebsd.org> <200704051307.56065.hselasky@c2i.net> <46165FAD.2030707@bindone.de> <200704061744.07179.hselasky@c2i.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Friday 06 April 2007 16:56, grem wrote:
>> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 16:09, grem wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> is there any way to get this into the source tree?
>>> Yes, I can take this patch into the P4 tree if you change it a little
>>> bit.
>>>
>>> I want this invalid residue detection to be all automatic:
>>>
>>> If the first residue you get is invalid, then it should use the USB
>>> transfer counts for residue for the rest of the lifetime of the device.
>>> Else it should use the standard invalid residue check.
>>>
>>> --HPS
>> Imho we should support both, so that devices which are so broken that we
>> can't detect the invalid residue (like I tried to point out before) still
>> have the quirk so force it manually.
> 
> Ok, no problem, but like Alexander Leidinger pointed out, the current flag 
> does not do anything, and should be removed from a couple of devices.
> 
>> Can you do the autodetection on your own or do you want me to do the change
>> to the patch and repost it so you can review? I have only one broken USB
>> device, so if anyone out there has access to more it would be extremely
>> helpful.
> 
> I can make a patch for this, and send it to you for testing, during the next 
> week.
> 
> --HPS

Any progress? :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4626BDC2.7060904>