Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:11:15 -0700 (PDT) From: KAYVEN RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu> To: John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce4 broke after pkgdb -Ff Message-ID: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171210290.25365@libra.sfsu.edu> In-Reply-To: <200705171446.33965.lists@jnielsen.net> References: <464B114C.5080703@net4.in> <44irarz7fs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171135570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu> <200705171446.33965.lists@jnielsen.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 May 2007, John Nielsen wrote: > On Thursday 17 May 2007 02:37:15 pm KAYVEN RIESE wrote: >> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>> Please don't top-post. >>> >>> KAYVEN RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu> writes: >>>> so the "-r" option will be the significant difference for the >>>> portupgrade comamnd, just verifying >>> >>> Yes. Otherwise, you may end up with some of the ports that depend on >>> pango being unable to use the new version. >>> >>> Make sure you look through the UPDATING file to see if there are any >>> other issues you need to take special action for at the same time. >> >> this guy seems to disagree >> >> jnielsendotnet:Try what I asked in my first reply (deleting and >> reinstalling pango manually), and see if you can get any error messages >> from xfce. >> >> If portupgrade -f is failing portupgrade -fr isn't likely to succeed >> either. > > Portupgrade with the -r option is very useful, and you will probably want to > use it. My point was that _before_ you try that you should figure out why > portupgrade is failing to upgrade pango, and/or upgrade it manually. > Otherwise it will just keep failing. > > JN > i guess i can see how u guys r on the same page then. he says -r won't help, u say it's nice. makes sense
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171210290.25365>