Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:30:38 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Olivier Mueller <om-lists-bsd@omx.ch>, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: suggestion: force removal and reinstallation of eaccelerator on php upgrade Message-ID: <4666A8EE.2040804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20070606130551.03fcb684@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <1181058492.30278.5.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> <1181059134.4722.2.camel@charlie.delphij.net> <4666634F.5050405@FreeBSD.org> <20070606130551.03fcb684@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ion-Mihai Tetcu ha scritto: > Why ? We did this in the past for enough ports, we do it for > claws-mail-*, etc. Do we bump every p5-* port when we update perl? No, but you are supposed to update them. Here is even more complex: if I update php4, why should php5 users update their extensions? There is no reason. And only a minimal part of the extensions will effectively require an update, so it's simpler to deal with them only when a breakage occurs. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4666A8EE.2040804>