Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:35:53 +0200
From:      Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To:        Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, scf@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: something wrong with Linux on 6.2-stable/amd64
Message-ID:  <20070722133553.619a5eab@deskjail>
In-Reply-To: <200707201317.32746@aldan>
References:  <200707192341.59940@aldan> <200707201013.13391@aldan> <20070720183925.540b7654@deskjail> <200707201317.32746@aldan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> (Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:17:=
32 -0400):

> On =D0=BF'=D1=8F=D1=82=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=86=D1=8F 20 =D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=BF=D0=
=B5=D0=BD=D1=8C 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> =3D Additional to what I told you in the last mail regarding reverting so=
me
> =3D MFCs: I have a patch which is at
> =3D http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/linuxolator/mfc/07_rest.diff
>=20
> ...
> --------------------------
> |diff -ruh sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master
> |--- sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master     Wed Jul  4 11:47:57 2007
> |+++ sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master     Tue Jun 26 12:57:36 2007
> --------------------------
> Patching file sys/i386/linux/syscalls.master using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 68.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 83.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 139.
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 158.
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 172.
> Hunk #6 failed at 223.
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 280.
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 308.
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 418.
> ...
>=20
> Attaching the syscalls.master.rej -- it seems, I already have this change=
=20
> (mprotect to linux_mprotect) applied.

Ok, I removed this part from the patch... did you test the above
regardless of the failed hunk? If not, please do.

> =3D You are the one with the problem at hand, and I'm the one with not
> =3D enough time ATM...
>=20
> A very regrettable attitude... I do appreciate, that despite expressing i=
t,=20
> you are still trying to help me, but fixing/investigating bugs is not the=
=20
> user's responsibility...

Lack of a small test which exhibits it and no intent on my side to
break the law by acquiring a copy of a commercial game from you makes
this way of handling it necessary. I also don't have a -stable system
on which I can test this.

And investigating bugs to some extend is the users responsibility. You
(as a developer) can not reproduce everything in an open source project
yourself, so you need feedback from users which cooperate.

Bye,
Alexander.

--=20
A little suffering is good for the soul.
		-- Kirk, "The Corbomite Maneuver", stardate 1514.0
http://www.Leidinger.net  Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org     netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID =3D 72077137



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070722133553.619a5eab>