Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:22:03 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?G=F3t_Andr=E1s?= <andrej@antiszoc.hu> To: "Clement Laforet" <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> Cc: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache20 ports kqueue problem Message-ID: <63181.80.98.32.167.1185132123.squirrel@duloc.webmedia.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070722110159.GA94054@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org> References: <56960.195.70.43.76.1184586249.squirrel@duloc.webmedia.hu> <20070722110159.GA94054@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Vas, Július 22, 2007 1:01 pm, Clement Laforet wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 01:44:09PM +0200, Gt Andrs wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> I tried to compile apache2 with kqueue support. Seemingly the apache >> configure process just not set the needed HAVE_KQUEUE constant. I >> checked up the apr configure script and found nothind about it, but I'm >> not a programmer guy so I could have easily looked on the wrong place. >> >> When I set WITH_KQUEUE_SUPPORT=yes the applying exp... patch is shown >> in the make process. When I restart apache and checks in top, it's is >> select and lockf state. On the same system I have postfix with kqueue >> enabled and in top there are the kread and other related states. >> >> Is there anybody who has apache20 compiled with kqueue support and it >> seemingly works? > > kqueue is used internally, not on listening sockets. > > clem > Of course not. In top you can see the process state. The kqueue enabled apache doesn't seem to enter any kqueue state.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?63181.80.98.32.167.1185132123.squirrel>