Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:30:02 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fine grain select locking. Message-ID: <f9djlr$ks3$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070803081520.B18327@fledge.watson.org> References: <20070702230728.E552@10.0.0.1> <20070703181242.T552@10.0.0.1> <20070704105525.GU45894@elvis.mu.org> <20070704114005.X552@10.0.0.1> <20070729180722.GB85196@rot26.obsecurity.org> <20070802174819.S561@10.0.0.1> <20070803081520.B18327@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Robert Watson wrote:
> As process based parallelism doesn't share the file descriptor table, it
> shouldn't affect non-threaded workloads such as Apache and pgSQL. This
Apache has multiple threaded modes ("MPM"s) and their use is increasing
(one major reason for it is that people have started to move away from
in-process PHP and onto fastcgi).
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGulH6ldnAQVacBcgRAidgAJkB7W50VdqSGfagu2BHuxBvFMrZAQCgvtfJ
e3HkqgGyUDCV05HdQTaRHhs=
=x4WD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f9djlr$ks3$1>