Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:43:51 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE on desktop system Message-ID: <20070917044351.GA17565@underworld.novel.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070916003323.U4507@10.0.0.1> References: <20070916061932.GA93480@underworld.novel.ru> <20070915234855.G531@10.0.0.1> <20070916071421.GA1320@underworld.novel.ru> <20070916003323.U4507@10.0.0.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > >> Jeff Roberson wrote: >> >>> This is contrary to the experiences of many others. Can you send me your >>> dmesg? There may be something about your particular hardware that is >>> triggering a bug. ULE is definitely designed to be responsive on the >>> desktop. >> >> Thanks for the quick answer! >> >> Here's my dmesg: http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/misc/dmesg.txt > > Roman, > > The enclosed patch helps things on my system, however, there are still some > delays due to IO issues. Let me know if this helps. This patch seems to make my system react faster. However I need some time to test it more carefully. > Thanks, > Jeff > >> >> Roman Bogorodskiy >> Roman Bogorodskiy [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBRu4GB4B0WzgdqspGAQKpEQQAlVF8KzVzGsjfBqcS8eHmGVIJ4vxpZwhR rvWSCi6NsjH7MuCKYxXBMeZ2sAt3QSQ8qXNKn+v/BXChSGe3/ZVtWxnZ4Qy1Uu4D ywRVPlE9N+qNmmIZtr/bpljgctBKH/rqx45aGvOqzqXTIDZCZyo4FVqyT0OYtLlk IxpLr5x9fdA= =QXsN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070917044351.GA17565>