Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:05:53 +0000 From: "Ben Kaduk" <minimarmot@gmail.com> To: "Dmitry Morozovsky" <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sgml entities for CPU architectures? Message-ID: <47d0403c0709221005t4a13f32bt9c56b5ef98283290@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070922205156.K70319@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <47d0403c0709211213n50988b33u2b9bdd15475bfcdd@mail.gmail.com> <1217454532.20070922005116@rulez.sk> <46F541FD.8040807@freebsd.org> <47d0403c0709220946q323af62ah1c4565b31f2677a@mail.gmail.com> <20070922205156.K70319@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/22/07, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Ben Kaduk wrote: > > BK> > >> I'm updating my patch to the FAQ (docs/115000) for danger@'s > BK> > >> (somewhat) new daily snapshot > BK> > >> builds, which are specific to x86 and amd64. Should I just use literals for > BK> > >> these architectures, or are the entity-ified somewhere that I haven't found yet? [snip] > I can see in share/sgml/freebsd.ent: > > <!-- Entities for various architectures. These are to be used > only for denoting a variant of FreeBSD for a particular > architecture (e.g. &os;/&arch.i386;). Other entities should > be used when referring generically to an architecture, > particularly because entities such as &i386; properly > denote trademarks and registered trademarks. --> > <!ENTITY arch.alpha "alpha"> > <!ENTITY arch.amd64 "amd64"> > <!ENTITY arch.arm "arm"> > <!ENTITY arch.i386 "i386"> > <!ENTITY arch.ia64 "ia64"> > <!ENTITY arch.pc98 "pc98"> > <!ENTITY arch.powerpc "powerpc"> > <!ENTITY arch.sparc64 "sparc64"> > <!ENTITY arch.sun4v "sun4v"> > > This is from rev 1.93 of freebsd.ent: > > date: 2007/08/11 19:17:41; author: bmah; state: Exp; lines: +15 -0 > Add &arch.*; entities for the various architectures. These > should only be used when referring to a version of FreeBSD on > a specific architecture, e.g. &os;/&arch.i386;. Use other, > already existing entities (such as &i386;) when talking generically > about an architecture, in order to attribute trademarks correctly. > > Thanks, Dmitry. These seem reasonable to describe danger@'s daily builds of FreeBSD-i386 and FreeBSD-amd64. I'm just surprised that I didn't see them before; I thought I looked in share/sgml/ -Ben Kaduk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47d0403c0709221005t4a13f32bt9c56b5ef98283290>