Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 18:18:00 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: freeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: best spam filter port(s) for postfix? Message-ID: <D3109E8F-F359-4C22-AEC0-B735F56A77EE@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20071001155353.F1106@bravo.pjkh.com> References: <4700052A.7050008@gracenpeace.net> <6.0.0.22.2.20070930152732.02576438@mail.computinginnovations.com> <200709302038.03763.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> <72cf361e0709302221h1a272d0fgfccfe176ff9f67da@mail.gmail.com> <F95B7CDF735EE600278C0E84@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20071001155353.F1106@bravo.pjkh.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Philip Hallstrom wrote: >> By far the best anti-spam tool I've used with Postfix is policyd- >> weight. >> mail/postfix-policyd-weight > > Agreed. +1. Me too. Seconded (or thirded :). policyd-weight is much smaller than amavisd-new or SpamAssassin (it tends to run a couple of ~7 MB RSIZE processes, rather than a bunch of 45 - 80MB RSIZE), and it's caching of RBL/DNSBL lookups means it can handle and offload a bunch of queries that the others would do. -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D3109E8F-F359-4C22-AEC0-B735F56A77EE>