Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:45:19 -0500 From: David Booth <davidb@boothscientific.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA1.5 Available... Message-ID: <200710252345.19900.davidb@boothscientific.com> In-Reply-To: <200710260433.l9Q4XBdx049302@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> References: <200710260433.l9Q4XBdx049302@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 25 October 2007, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > On Thursday 25 October 2007, Ken Smith wrote: > > > Sorry, I had a bit of a false start with 7.0-BETA1. I've got > > > sets of build machines used for the Monthly Snapshots and > > > procedures in place to try and minimize the mistakes I could > > > make while doing those Snapshots (previously one set for HEAD, > > > one set for RELENG_6). The set of machines I'll be using for > > > the 7.0-RELEASE build are the ones that had previously been > > > doing the HEAD snapshots and I missed doing one very important > > > adjustment to the build routine while doing the BETA1 builds, > > > which resulted in the builds being based on HEAD. I didn't > > > notice during the tests I do before uploading it because the > > > build procedure makes most things (e.g. uname) say what you > > > told it to build, you need to look harder to discover that sort > > > of mistake. So, 7.0-BETA1 actually should have been called > > > something more like 8.0-SURPRISE... :-( > > > > > > Sorry for the screw-up. > > > > This change seems to break portupgrade. It complains that it > > cannot parse the output of uname. I think it is not capable of > > handling the 1.5 after the BETA. > > I hadn't tried that... When you do build a new kernel, it > goes back to BETA1 though. > > Tuc Or you can take care of it by setenvr until then.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200710252345.19900.davidb>