Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:45:30 -0600 From: "John Smith" <johnjgsmith@gmail.com> To: "Giorgos Keramidas" <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nanobsd, picobsd, tinybsd Message-ID: <e1ca25ac0711101345o6579dabcgf5ac96d6481099c2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20071110154011.GB2060@kobe.laptop> References: <e1ca25ac0711091501p6adca6a4j68d902b455e0f2f2@mail.gmail.com> <20071110154011.GB2060@kobe.laptop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'd expected a more level headed reply from this FreeBSD list. How is a newbie supposed to know the differenced and how can I test this if I don't have a spare machine? My question was more out of interest. This mailing list is called FreeBSD-Questions, so why can't I asked a reasonable question and expect a reasonable reply...? On Nov 10, 2007 9:40 AM, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> wrote: > On 2007-11-09 17:01, John Smith <johnjgsmith@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can anybody please explain to my what the differences are between > > nanobsd, picobsd and tinybsd. > > > > They all seem to be doing the same (creating a minimal FreeBSD image > > that can be used in embedded systems), or is this not right? > > What don't you experiment with them, and see? :) > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e1ca25ac0711101345o6579dabcgf5ac96d6481099c2>