Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:55:28 +0000 From: Marko Zec <zec@icir.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: bms@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Reinhard Haller <reinhard.haller@interactive-net.de> Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA2 routed and multicast registration Message-ID: <200711161655.29348.zec@icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20071116145807.G10677@fledge.watson.org> References: <4732110D.3090808@interactive-net.de> <200711072245.05430.zec@icir.org> <20071116145807.G10677@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 16 November 2007 14:58:43 Robert Watson wrote: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Marko Zec wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 November 2007 19:25:01 Reinhard Haller wrote: > >> routed has problems with setsockopt registering itself for > >> multicast. The trace contains the following messages: > >> > >> IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP ALLROUTERS: Can't assign requested address turn > >> on RIP setsockopt(IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP RIP): Can't assign requested > >> address setsockopt(rdisc_sock,IP_MULTICAST_IF): Can't assign > >> requested address > >> > >> Any suggestions? > > > > Perhaps the attached kernel patch could help? > > Dear all-- > > Just catching up on back e-mail, and found this. Did this patch go > anywhere (CVS HEAD, with an MFC, for example)? No it didn't. The patch restores support for interpreting 0.0.0.0/8 addresses as interface indexes, which was removed 5 months ago when in_mcast.c was originally introduced. bms@ posted the patch for review before commiting it, but I can't recall a wider discussion taking place about that change. Cheers, Marko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200711161655.29348.zec>