Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:58:06 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>, Mark Evans <mbe2@bayou.com> Subject: Re: ls -l takes a forever to finish. Message-ID: <20071129185735.Y20307@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20071129154230.5ba29b43@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> References: <005901c8313f$f7048b70$0d00a8c0@bayoucshaffer> <474CA49D.50306@FreeBSD.org> <002001c831d5$80ad8670$0d00a8c0@bayoucshaffer> <a969fbd10711280752v7d38070x5f34d9d652ec4f7f@mail.gmail.com> <003101c831da$a405bc50$0d00a8c0@bayoucshaffer> <20071129122043.A9040@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20071129084244.eaba6f7a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20071129154230.5ba29b43@epia-2.farid-hajji.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I guess that replacing qsort(3) in > /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/fts.c:fts_sort() > with another sort algorithm which doesn't > expose this anomaly would solve that problem. for sure his /home wasn't worst case. it's just average case so it's not that problem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071129185735.Y20307>