Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:53:48 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Cc: Reko Turja <reko.turja@liukuma.net>, rrs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7 trivial problems / notes Message-ID: <200712111153.lBBBrmYl001945@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: <20071211004531.GB11140@kobe.laptop> References: <fjho0k$hdc$1@ger.gmane.org> <20071210002131.GA74729@kobe.laptop> <002801c83b05$56ab20b0$3a2a13ac@staff.ktc.lan> <20071211004258.GA11140@kobe.laptop> <20071211004531.GB11140@kobe.laptop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > Does the following look ok?
> A more complete patch, touching GENERIC for all architectures would be
> like the following patch, of course:
Looks good, it would be nice if someone commited that.
( I too got bitten by SCTP, when commenting out INET6 (which
I didnt want, while leaving in SCTP for later removal, as I
didnt know if something else new might depend on SCTP).
Julian
--
Julian Stacey. Munich Consultant: BSD Unix Linux. http://berklix.com
Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz. Dump cigs 4 snuff.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200712111153.lBBBrmYl001945>