Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:38:25 -0600 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ion3 removal (Re: Ion3 license violation) Message-ID: <20071213023825.GA4454@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20071213022142.GA3862@soaustin.net> References: <20071212213200.D576216A469@hub.freebsd.org> <200712121701.57460.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <20071212183542.f9bf5e55.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200712121930.46708.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <20071213021217.GA3535@soaustin.net> <20071213022142.GA3862@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It was pulled from Debian, as well: http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ion3/news/20070310T233909Z.html As far as I'm concerned, the matter is closed. When 4 different* OS groups come to the same conclusion, I think there's not much else to say. mcl * pkgsrc, ArchLinux, Debian, and now FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071213023825.GA4454>