Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:32:35 +0300 From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru> To: vermaden <vermaden@interia.pl> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: default route Message-ID: <SFS5gsaGHpSGZKi3448tBosxyP4@IWrYdQYFhFz6qMemZF%2B6cD72nAY> In-Reply-To: <20071214102032.51D6D259A3A@f16.poczta.interia.pl> References: <20071214102032.51D6D259A3A@f16.poczta.interia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:20:32AM +0100, vermaden wrote: > I already used tcpdump, if ICMP packet goes in thru 192.168/16 on rl1 the > response goes out on 10/24 on rl0. And the destination MAC address of the ICMP reply that is going through rl0 is? What if you'll do two experiments: drop the default route and change it to something in the 192.168/16? Will ping results be the same or packets will be thrown out through another interfaces? What FreeBSD version you're using? -- Eygene
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SFS5gsaGHpSGZKi3448tBosxyP4>