Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:33:44 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opinion on cross-port OPTIONS CONFLICTS Message-ID: <20071222043344.GB82459@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <200712212105.21520.josh@tcbug.org> References: <200712211524.25454.josh@tcbug.org> <200712211613.50439.josh@tcbug.org> <20071222015059.GA82459@k7.mavetju> <200712212105.21520.josh@tcbug.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 09:05:18PM -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > > It also doesn't work if someone runs make rmconfig, or make config again > > > and changes things after the port is installed. > > > > > > It probably doesn't work if a package was used to install either. > > > > Create a slave port audio/arts-withoutnas and let it depends on > > that one. > > I don't think that's a scalable solution. It would create an explosion of > ports in the already taxed tree, as well as confusion as to which port to > install among the users. And what is your solution for this problem? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071222043344.GB82459>