Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:50:53 -0600 From: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> Subject: Re: Opinion on cross-port OPTIONS CONFLICTS Message-ID: <200712221150.59971.josh@tcbug.org> In-Reply-To: <20071222043344.GB82459@k7.mavetju> References: <200712211524.25454.josh@tcbug.org> <200712212105.21520.josh@tcbug.org> <20071222043344.GB82459@k7.mavetju>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart3173348.g2iU4y5HAs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 21 December 2007 10:33:44 pm Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 09:05:18PM -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > > > It also doesn't work if someone runs make rmconfig, or make config > > > > again and changes things after the port is installed. > > > > > > > > It probably doesn't work if a package was used to install either. > > > > > > Create a slave port audio/arts-withoutnas and let it depends on > > > that one. > > > > I don't think that's a scalable solution. It would create an explosion > > of ports in the already taxed tree, as well as confusion as to which po= rt > > to install among the users. > > And what is your solution for this problem? > > Edwin My initial solution as I posted is to register the OPTIONs used to build a= =20 port in /var/db/pkg =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel PGP: 8A48 EF36 5E9F 4EDA 5A8C 11B4 26F9 01F1 27AF AECB --nextPart3173348.g2iU4y5HAs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHbU6DJvkB8SevrssRAnbRAJ99lknV/7tPgpkwpcWPOHDItpSxlgCfZoVd N/2MgN9lBxwPRQNbZFwg200= =Grzx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3173348.g2iU4y5HAs--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200712221150.59971.josh>