Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:09:00 +0400
From:      "Tofig Suleymanov" <tofig@freebsd.az>
To:        "Robert Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: if_start running deferred for Giant
Message-ID:  <342414370712302309i2fbaff2ex4888d51d51eaa99c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071231002840.N21364@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <4777690B.1030403@freebsd.az> <20071230170217.T6382@fledge.watson.org> <47780CE4.3000302@freebsd.az> <20071231002840.N21364@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/31/07, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Tofig Suleymanov wrote:
>
> >>> xxxxxx kernel: ib0: if_start running deferred for Giant
> >>>
> >>> I am not sure what does this exactly mean.
> >>>
> >>> Any help would be appreciated.
> >>
> >> This occurs when a network device driver has declared itself IFF_NEEDSGIANT
> >> -- that is, has declared that it requires the Giant lock in order to
> >> operate. As this is considered an undesirable state of affairs for a device
> >> driver, a warning is printed. However, in the case of a USB device driver,
> >> it is currently required as the USB framework is not MPSAFE, so requires
> >> Giant.
> >
> > Thanks for clarification. Does it mean that I can ignore this notice when
> > dealing with USB framework ?
>
> For now, yes.  When, at some point, the USB framework is MPSAFE, we'll need to
> remove IFF_NEEDSGIANT, and I'd make sure that your device driver is as ready
> as it can be to operate Giant-free once that's done.
>
> Robert N M Watson
> Computer Laboratory
> University of Cambridge
>

Now it is clear to me.

Thanks for your help.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?342414370712302309i2fbaff2ex4888d51d51eaa99c>