Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:18:17 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community Message-ID: <47862929.50901@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200801101413.m0AEDZsb058894@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200801101413.m0AEDZsb058894@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > > > Just a side question... if it is so complete why was there a need to > > modify the orginal UCB version?... specifically there is no reason not > > to discuss improvements. > > The modification that happened was to remove restrictions. > What you propose is to add restrictions, which means that > it would be less free. That's a step backwards and will > not happen. Which are completely optional (adding options is always good)... as it currently stands it makes the situation no real option except for making the != in my signature into a == > > > If the root cause of the OP's issues is lack of interest in older code > > The OP's posting rather sounds like regression testing and > QA needs to be improved. Which are always unglamorous jobs and thus the least likelly to be done without some kind of reward greater then a pat on the back. - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Developer Tools. http://www.flosoft-systems.com Developer, not business, friendly. "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHhikpjRvRjGmHRgQRAvmZAKCzdLHoAgy5oNL66HKBBnhfJasFSgCgiW2V w7pBfhNhYrF3lqS5XYhgPTU= =nPho -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47862929.50901>