Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:20:05 +0000 From: Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help Message-ID: <4794F065.5070800@tomjudge.com> In-Reply-To: <20080121174818.GA11928@verio.net> References: <001b01c85c0f$6ca051d0$1e01c80a@John> <4794703A.4020801@FreeBSD.org> <4794CC56.2030802@tomjudge.com> <20080121174818.GA11928@verio.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David DeSimone wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> wrote: >>>> my question is how to configure 2 nics with different ip on same >>>> box in the same subnet. >>> Configure the second with a /32 prefix (netmask 255.255.255.255) >>> instead of the usual netmask. >> Surely this configuration will cause all the reply's to be routed out >> of re0 without some form of pfil layer manipulation? > > If both nic's are connected to the same broadcast domain, what > difference does it make which nic sends the traffic? > This could cause some arp related issues at the other end? What if the remote end point updates its arp entry because it thinks the remote endpoints address has changed (as it has a direct route to the network i.e. it has an IP in 10.200.1/24). It may be worth the original OP investigating if_lagg as it may provide some better solutions. Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4794F065.5070800>