Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:04:53 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dev.* analogue for interfaces Message-ID: <868x1eja16.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20080221193217.GF96595@funkthat.com> (John-Mark Gurney's message of "Thu\, 21 Feb 2008 11\:32\:17 -0800") References: <86odacc04t.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080221072410.GC96595@funkthat.com> <86ablua4pk.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080221193217.GF96595@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> writes: > My case is perfectly clear. We already have dev.* for this, and you > want to add a second, confusing, place to put similar/same information... > Yes, this is specific for network interfaces, but what makes a network > interface special that it's configuration can't live in dev.*? You > stated that you were fine w/ some items being in dev.* and others in > net.if.* for the same device, which is why I objected. If you can't tell the difference between a struct ifnet and a device_t, I'm afraid we're going to have to agree to disagree. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868x1eja16.fsf>