Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:08:59 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?Qm9nZGFuIMSGdWxpYnJr?= <bc@default.co.yu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It is safe to build ports for 7.0 from a 6.3 chroot? Message-ID: <47CD57FB.5080707@default.co.yu> In-Reply-To: <200803041402.47267.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <20080303200933.GA909@gauss.sanabria.es> <200803040214.50082.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47CD3B79.7070607@default.co.yu> <200803041402.47267.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mel wrote: | | Just cause it doesn't fall into your 95% slice, doesn't make it messy. It's in | fact cleaner then using compat6x, *because* compat6x doesn't fall into the | category of potential causes when things don't work. | FYI: tinderbox is based on the pointyhat build cluster, which makes all | the 'messy' packages for the FreeBSD package servers. | I will stop discussion right here, because it has tendency to bring out endless flame of you-know-what-about. Starter of this thread didn't even mention what services he is running and just by that is pointless to discuss about approaches in upgrade of anything. Hats off to tinderbox or however binary packages are made, but that has nothing to do on how to upgrade freebsd system. - -- Best regards, Bogdan Culibrk bc@default.co.yu http://default.co.yu/~bc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkfNV/oACgkQo6C4vAhYtCCi7wCbBhCk7uphbo1vqK9CDxnGYx7S XycAniBYNk/QR6sUJkbBbMnCbNOZBRO1 =GXvR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47CD57FB.5080707>