Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:45:36 -0500 From: eculp <eculp@encontacto.net> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 version of Opera Message-ID: <20080316194536.72547k6tm4e9is4c@intranet.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <20080316194846.4cda0a30@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <1205628574.1018.7.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <20080316082751.56d25c28@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <op.t736ifttt0fgli@imac.local> <20080316172443.68ba1bb9@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20080316120622.14115mdcb0pnrsco@intranet.encontacto.net> <20080316194846.4cda0a30@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:06:22 -0500
> eculp <eculp@encontacto.net> wrote:
>
>> Quoting Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>:
>>
>> < SNIP >
>> >
>> > So what? Yell about it in pre-everything:: and pkg-message. It will
>> > give you some early real-world testing.
>> >
>> > Personally I won't run a snapshot (except if asked) since I relay on
>> > Opera much to much:
>> > 95562 itetcu 1 44 19 163M 155M select 0 113:55 0.00%
>> > operapluginwrapper
>> > 95442 itetcu 1 44 0 96956K 81628K select 0 113:00 0.00% opera
>> > 95560 itetcu 1 8 0 96956K 81628K nanslp 1 39:07 0.00% opera
>> > 5 windows (about 100 tabs) in the native version and one window (about
>> > 20 tabs) in the linux version.
>>
>> The opera beta runs great using the install.sh.
>
> I don't say it doesn't/wouldn't, I just say I don't want to take the
> risk of something blowing my ~100 tabs (I know I relay to much on the
> wonderful idea of sessions but it's really nice to be able to have the
> site you are working / reading / etc. come up when you start opera).
Most of us probably do. I am guilty of at least 25 even when I am =20
always trying to minimize. It is very nice as are the ability to save =20
sessions every once in a while.
>
>> I see you are running operapluginwrapper and just tried to install it
>> and get the following error on it and few other emulation related ports.
>>
>> /usr/ports/ # make install
>> =3D=3D=3D> Installing for opera-linuxplugins-9.21.20070510_1
>> =3D=3D=3D> opera-linuxplugins-9.21.20070510_1 depends on file: =20
>> /usr/local/share/opera/plugins/libnpp.so - not found
>> =3D=3D=3D> Verifying install for =20
>> /usr/local/share/opera/plugins/libnpp.so in /usr/ports/www/opera
>
> I don't have www/opera-linuxplugins installed (and I'm getting a
> warning window about libnpp.so not being found when I start opera -
> which I ignore).
>
> I prefer the hassle of copy/pasting from opera to linux-opera a link to
> a page with flash to being harassed by flash adds on some sites I read
> often.
>
>> =3D=3D=3D> opera-9.26.20080215 depends on shared library: aspell.16 =
- found
>> =3D=3D=3D> opera-9.26.20080215 depends on shared library: c_r.4 - no=
t found
>> =3D=3D=3D> Verifying install for c_r.4 in /usr/ports/misc/compat4x
>
> Nothing more here ?
>
>> =3D=3D=3D> Returning to build of opera-9.26.20080215
>> Error: shared library "c_r.4" does not exist
>> *** Error code 1
>
> Strange. Do you have /usr/local/lib/compat/libc_r.so.4.compat4x ?
I have a complete group of compats from 4 to 6.
>> Could this be because of having changed to emulators/linux_base-f7 and
>> kernel 2.6.16?
>
> I don't see why.
Neither do I but the good news is that flash is working in Opera:
Version 9.50 Beta 2
Build 1834
Platform FreeBSD
System amd64, 8.0-CURRENT
Qt library 3.3.8
Java Java Runtime Environment installed
without my intervention. I have the linux-flashplugin7 installed and =20
nothing else that I am aware of. So for now the c_r.4 error doesn't =20
bother me.
opera:plugins
All the plugins that I have installed seem to be detected without =20
opera-linuxplugins. I had no idea that Opera was going to detect the =20
linux-flash plugin.
Thanks,
ed
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080316194536.72547k6tm4e9is4c>